Bodily tides near spin-orbit resonances
Michael Efroimsky

TL;DR
This paper develops a more accurate model of spin-orbit coupling near resonances by deriving the frequency-dependent tidal torque from first principles, improving upon traditional assumptions of constant or inverse frequency Q.
Contribution
It introduces a first-principles derivation of the frequency dependence of tidal torque in the Darwin model, accounting for complex rheology and oscillating torque components near resonances.
Findings
The tidal torque smoothly passes through zero at resonances.
The model explains the Moon's observed frequency-dependent dissipation.
The secular part of the torque aligns with resonance crossing behavior.
Abstract
Spin-orbit coupling can be described in two approaches. The method known as "the MacDonald torque" is often combined with an assumption that the quality factor Q is frequency-independent. This makes the method inconsistent, because the MacDonald theory tacitly fixes the rheology by making Q scale as the inverse tidal frequency. Spin-orbit coupling can be treated also in an approach called "the Darwin torque". While this theory is general enough to accommodate an arbitrary frequency-dependence of Q, this advantage has not yet been exploited in the literature, where Q is assumed constant or is set to scale as inverse tidal frequency, the latter assertion making the Darwin torque equivalent to a corrected version of the MacDonald torque. However neither a constant nor an inverse-frequency Q reflect the properties of realistic mantles and crusts, because the actual frequency-dependence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
