The effects of the target material properties and layering on the crater chronology: the case of Raditladi and Rachmaninoff basins on Mercury
S. Marchi (1), M. Massironi (2), G. Cremonese (3), E. Martellato (4),, L. Giacomini (2), L. Prockter (5) ((1) Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur, (2), Padova University, (3) INAF, (4) CISAS, (5) APL, Johns Hopkins University)

TL;DR
This study determines the ages of Raditladi and Rachmaninoff basins on Mercury using crater chronology, revealing their relatively young ages and suggesting recent volcanic activity, while emphasizing the importance of target layering in age estimates.
Contribution
It introduces a method to incorporate terrain layering and properties into crater-based age determination for planetary surfaces.
Findings
Rachmaninoff basin age ~3.6 Ga
Raditladi basin age ~1.1 Ga
Evidence of recent volcanic activity on Mercury
Abstract
In this paper we present a crater age determination of several terrains associated with the Raditladi and Rachmaninoff basins. These basins were discovered during the first and third MESSENGER flybys of Mercury, respectively. One of the most interesting features of both basins is their relatively fresh appearance. The young age of both basins is confirmed by our analysis on the basis of age determination via crater chronology. The derived Rachmaninoff and Raditladi basin model ages are about 3.6 Ga and 1.1 Ga, respectively. Moreover, we also constrain the age of the smooth plains within the basins' floors. This analysis shows that Mercury had volcanic activity until recent time, possibly to about 1 Ga or less. We find that some of the crater size-frequency distributions investigated suggest the presence of a layered target. Therefore, within this work we address the importance of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
