Misleading Stars: What Cannot Be Measured in the Internet?
Yvonne Anne Pignolet, Stefan Schmid, Gilles Tredan

TL;DR
This paper investigates the fundamental limitations of inferring Internet network topology from traceroute data, highlighting what cannot be reliably measured and the impact of incomplete or anonymous data on network analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a worst-case, axiomatic framework for analyzing the inferability of network properties from traceroute data, emphasizing the limitations in measuring certain network features.
Findings
Inferrable topologies can vary greatly in structure.
Node degrees are difficult to determine from traceroute data.
Complete trace sets can reveal global network properties.
Abstract
Traceroute measurements are one of our main instruments to shed light onto the structure and properties of today's complex networks such as the Internet. This paper studies the feasibility and infeasibility of inferring the network topology given traceroute data from a worst-case perspective, i.e., without any probabilistic assumptions on, e.g., the nodes' degree distribution. We attend to a scenario where some of the routers are anonymous, and propose two fundamental axioms that model two basic assumptions on the traceroute data: (1) each trace corresponds to a real path in the network, and (2) the routing paths are at most a factor 1/alpha off the shortest paths, for some parameter alpha in (0,1]. In contrast to existing literature that focuses on the cardinality of the set of (often only minimal) inferrable topologies, we argue that a large number of possible topologies alone is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
