A Photometric Redshift of z ~ 9.4 for GRB 090429B
A. Cucchiara, A. J. Levan, D. B. Fox, N. R. Tanvir, T. N. Ukwatta, E., Berger, T. Kr\"uhler, A. K\"upc\"u Yolda\c{s}, X. F. Wu, K. Toma, J. Greiner,, F. Olivares E., A. Rowlinson, L. Amati, T. Sakamoto, K. Roth, A. Stephens, A., Fritz, J.P.U. Fynbo, J. Hjorth, D. Malesani

TL;DR
This paper reports a photometric redshift of approximately 9.4 for GRB 090429B, using deep multi-telescope observations, supporting its origin in the early Universe and providing insights into high-redshift star formation.
Contribution
It presents the first robust photometric redshift estimate of a gamma-ray burst at z~9.4, utilizing multiple dust laws and deep optical/infrared observations to confirm its high-redshift nature.
Findings
Redshift estimate of z~9.4 with 90% likelihood range 9.06-9.52
Host galaxy undetected at deep limits, supporting high-redshift origin
GRB energetics similar to lower-redshift bursts
Abstract
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) serve as powerful probes of the early Universe, with their luminous afterglows revealing the locations and physical properties of star forming galaxies at the highest redshifts, and potentially locating first generation (Population III) stars. Since GRB afterglows have intrinsically very simple spectra, they allow robust redshifts from low signal to noise spectroscopy, or photometry. Here we present a photometric redshift of z~9.4 for the Swift-detected GRB 090429B based on deep observations with Gemini-North, the Very Large Telescope, and the GRB Optical and Near-infrared Detector. Assuming a Small Magellanic Cloud dust law (which has been found in a majority of GRB sight-lines), the 90% likelihood range for the redshift is 9.06 < z < 9.52, although there is a low-probability tail to somewhat lower redshifts. Adopting Milky Way or Large Magellanic Cloud dust…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
