Calibrating Extinction-Free Star Formation Rate Diagnostics with 33GHz Free-Free Emission in NGC6946
E.J. Murphy, J.J. Condon, E. Schinnerer, R.C. Kennicutt Jr., D., Calzetti, L. Armus, G. Helou, J.L. Turner, G. Aniano, P. Beir\~ao, A.D., Bolatto, B.R. Brandl, K.V. Croxall, D.A. Dale, J.L. Donovan Meyer, B.T., Draine, C. Engelbracht, L.K. Hunt, C.-N. Hao, J. Koda, H. Roussel

TL;DR
This study calibrates extinction-free star formation rate diagnostics using 33GHz free-free emission in NGC6946, finding that 33GHz measurements provide a reliable SFR indicator across different regions, with some dust-based methods overestimating nuclear SFRs.
Contribution
It demonstrates that 33GHz free-free emission is a robust and reliable tracer of star formation rates, improving calibration accuracy over traditional dust-based diagnostics, especially in galaxy nuclei.
Findings
33GHz free-free emission closely matches SFRs in extranuclear regions.
Dust-based SFR indicators overestimate nuclear SFRs by a factor of ~2.
Total 33GHz emission provides accurate SFR estimates due to high thermal fractions.
Abstract
Abridged: Using free-free emission measured in the Ka-band (26-40GHz) for 10 star-forming regions in the nearby galaxy NGC6946, including its starbursting nucleus, we compare a number of SFR diagnostics that are typically considered to be unaffected by interstellar extinction: i.e., non-thermal radio (i.e., 1.4GHz), total infrared (IR; 8-1000um), and warm dust (i.e., 24um) emission, along with the hybrid (obscured + unobscured) indicators of H\alpha+24um and UV+IR. The 33GHz free-free emission is assumed to provide the most accurate measure of the current SFR. Among the extranuclear star-forming regions, the 24um, H\alpha+24um and UV+IR SFR calibrations are in good agreement with the 33GHz free-free SFRs. However, each of the SFR calibrations relying on some form of dust emission overestimate the nuclear SFR by a factor of ~2. This is more likely the result of excess dust heating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
