On the size-luminosity relation of AGN dust tori in the mid-infrared
Konrad R. W. Tristram (1), Marc Schartmann (2) ((1), Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany, (2), Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany)

TL;DR
This paper refines the size-luminosity relation of AGN dust tori using mid-infrared interferometry, compares observations with models, and discusses implications for AGN structure, emphasizing the need for more precise measurements.
Contribution
It improves the accuracy of the AGN dust torus size-luminosity relation and compares observational data with hydrodynamical and radiative transfer models.
Findings
Gaussian approximation effectively estimates brightness distribution sizes
Model sizes align with measurements but show face-on/edge-on offset not observed in current data
Mid- to near-infrared size ratio is approximately 30
Abstract
Interferometric measurements in the mid-infrared have shown that the sizes of the warm dust distributions in active galactic nuclei are consistent with their scaling with the square root of their luminosity. We carry out a more detailed analysis of this size-luminosity relation to investigate which of the general properties of the dusty tori in active galactic nuclei can be derived from this relation. We improve the accuracy of the size-luminosity relation by adding a few additional size measurements from more recent interferometric observations and compare the measured sizes to those derived from hydrodynamical and radiative transfer models of AGN tori. We find that a Gaussian approximation yields a reasonable estimate of the size of the brightness distribution, as long as the visibilities are within 0.2 {\leg} V {\leg} 0.9. The size estimates derived from the models are consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
