The augmented operator of a surjective partial differential operator with constant coefficients need not be surjective
Thomas Kalmes

TL;DR
This paper constructs an example showing that the augmented operator of a surjective constant coefficient differential operator may not be surjective, answering a previously open question in the theory of differential operators.
Contribution
It provides the first known example demonstrating that the augmented operator of a surjective differential operator with constant coefficients can fail to be surjective.
Findings
Constructed a specific example for d ≥ 3
Showed the augmented operator is not surjective
Answered an open problem in the field
Abstract
For we give an example of a constant coefficient surjective differential operator over some open subset such that is not surjective, where . This answers in the negative a problem posed by Bonet and Doma\'nski in \cite[Problem 9.1]{Bonet}.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
