Physical solutions of the Kitaev honeycomb model
Fabio L. Pedrocchi, Stefano Chesi, and Daniel Loss

TL;DR
This paper provides an exact solution for the physical states of the Kitaev honeycomb model, revealing how fermion parity depends on vortex configurations and boundary conditions, impacting the calculation of physical quantities.
Contribution
It derives an explicit formula for the projector onto the physical subspace and analyzes how physical fermion parity varies with vortex configurations and boundary conditions.
Findings
Physical states characterized by fermion parity depend on vortex configuration.
Analytical expression for fermion parity in vortex-free case with constant gauge field.
Significant differences in vortex energies when considering the physical subspace versus unprojected space.
Abstract
We investigate the exact solution of the honeycomb model proposed by Kitaev and derive an explicit formula for the projector onto the physical subspace. The physical states are simply characterized by the parity of the total occupation of the fermionic eigenmodes. We consider a general lattice on a torus and show that the physical fermion parity depends in a nontrivial way on the vortex configuration and the choice of boundary conditions. In the vortex-free case with a constant gauge field we are able to obtain an analytical expression of the parity. For a general configuration of the gauge field the parity can be easily evaluated numerically, which allows the exact diagonalization of large spin models. We consider physically relevant quantities, as in particular the vortex energies, and show that their true value and associated states can be substantially different from the one…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
