Unification of Dynamical Determination and Bare Minimal Phenomenological Constraints in No-Scale F-SU(5)
Tianjun Li, James A. Maxin, Dimitri V. Nanopoulos, and Joel W. Walker

TL;DR
This paper refines the parameter space of No-Scale F-SU(5), integrating phenomenological constraints and theoretical consistency, predicting testable particles and a Higgs mass around 120 GeV, with implications for LHC and dark matter detection.
Contribution
It provides an enhanced, detailed analysis of No-Scale F-SU(5), combining phenomenological and theoretical constraints to identify a viable parameter space and making specific predictions for collider and dark matter experiments.
Findings
Viable parameter space identified within phenomenological constraints.
Predicted lightest CP-even Higgs mass around 120 GeV.
Vector-like particles could be produced at the LHC with distinctive signatures.
Abstract
We revisit the construction of the viable parameter space of No-Scale F-SU(5), a model built on the F-lipped SU(5)xU(1)_X gauge group, supplemented by a pair of F-theory derived vector-like multiplets at the TeV scale, and the dynamically established boundary conditions of No-Scale Supergravity. Employing an updated numerical algorithm and a substantially upgraded computational engine, we significantly enhance the scope, detail and accuracy of our prior study. We sequentially apply a set of "bare-minimal" phenomenological constraints, consisting of i) the dynamically established boundary conditions of No-Scale Supergravity, ii) consistent radiative electroweak symmetry breaking, iii) precision LEP constraints on the light supersymmetric mass content, iv) the world average top-quark mass, and v) a light neutralino satisfying the 7-year WMAP cold dark matter relic density measurement. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
