Cosmic shear covariance: The log-normal approximation

TL;DR

This paper introduces a simplified log-normal approximation for cosmic shear covariance that improves accuracy over the normal approximation, ensuring positive-semidefinite matrices for reliable parameter estimation in weak lensing surveys.

Contribution

It derives a new simplified log-normal approximation for cosmic shear covariance that is as easy to use as the normal approximation but more accurate and reliable.

Findings

Normal approximation underestimates shear covariances.

Log-normal approximation provides more realistic covariances.

Simplified log-normal approximation is nearly as accurate as full log-normal.

Abstract

[Abridged] We seek approximations to the cosmic shear covariance that are as easy to use as the common approximations based on normal statistics, but yield more accurate covariance matrices and parameter errors. We derive expressions for the cosmic shear covariance under the assumption that the underlying convergence field follows log-normal statistics. We also derive a simplified version of this log-normal approximation. We use numerical simulations of weak lensing to study how well the normal, log-normal, and simplified log-normal approximations as well as empirical corrections to the normal approximation proposed in the literature reproduce shear covariances for cosmic shear surveys. We find that the normal approximation substantially underestimates the cosmic shear covariances and the inferred parameter confidence regions, in particular for surveys with small fields of view and large galaxy densities, but also for very wide surveys. In contrast, the log-normal approximation yields more realistic covariances and confidence regions, but also requires evaluating slightly more complicated expressions. However, the simplified log-normal approximation, although as simple as the normal approximation, yields confidence regions that are almost as accurate as those obtained from the log-normal approximation. The empirical corrections to the normal approximation do not yield more accurate covariances and confidence regions than the (simplified) log-normal approximation. Moreover, they fail to produce positive-semidefinite data covariance matrices in certain cases, rendering them unusable for parameter estimation. The simplified log-normal approximation should be used in favour of the normal approximation for parameter estimation and parameter error forecasts. Any approximation to the cosmic shear covariance should ensure a positive-semidefinite data covariance matrix.