A BK inequality for randomly drawn subsets of fixed size
J. van den Berg, J. Jonasson

TL;DR
This paper proves a BK inequality for measures that select subsets of fixed size uniformly, extending the inequality's applicability beyond product measures to these specific non-product measures.
Contribution
The paper establishes the BK inequality for fixed-size subset measures, a natural non-product measure, and extends the result to weighted and product measures.
Findings
Proved BK inequality for uniform fixed-size subset measures.
Extended the inequality to weighted versions of these measures.
Demonstrated applicability to products of such measures.
Abstract
The BK inequality (\cite{BK85}) says that,for product measures on , the probability that two increasing events and `occur disjointly' is at most the product of the two individual probabilities. The conjecture in \cite{BK85} that this holds for {\em all} events was proved by Reimer (cite{R00}). Several other problems in this area remained open. For instance, although it is easy to see that non-product measures cannot satisfy the above inequality for {\em all} events,there are several such measures which, intuitively, should satisfy the inequality for all{\em increasing} events. One of the most natural candidates is the measure assigning equal probabilities to all configurations with exactly 1's (and probability 0 to all other configurations). The main contribution of this paper is a proof for these measures. We also point out how our result extends to weighted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and statistical mechanics · Probability and Risk Models · Random Matrices and Applications
