Using the Fundamental Plane of Black Hole Activity to Distinguish X-ray Processes from Weakly Accreting Black Holes
Richard M. Plotkin (U. Amsterdam, NL), Sera Markoff (U. Amsterdam,, NL), Brandon C. Kelly (CfA, Cambridge), Elmar Koerding (U. Nijmegen, NL),, Scott F. Anderson (U. Washington, Seattle)

TL;DR
This study refines the fundamental plane of black hole activity using Bayesian regression, revealing that X-ray emission in sub-Eddington black holes is mainly from jets, and discusses how cooling effects can bias interpretations.
Contribution
The paper introduces a Bayesian approach to refine the fundamental plane, clarifies the dominant X-ray emission processes in black holes, and highlights potential biases from jet cooling effects.
Findings
X-ray emission in sub-Eddington black holes is mainly optically thin synchrotron radiation from jets.
FR I galaxies are difficult to place on the fundamental plane due to jet cooling effects.
High-energy peaked BL Lac objects follow the refined fundamental plane relation.
Abstract
The fundamental plane of black hole activity is a relation between X-ray luminosity, radio luminosity, and black hole mass for hard state Galactic black holes and their supermassive analogs. The fundamental plane suggests that, at low-accretion rates, the physical processes regulating the conversion of an accretion flow into radiative energy could be universal across the entire black hole mass scale. However, there is still a need to further refine the fundamental plane in order to better discern the radiative processes and their geometry very close to the black hole, in particular the source of hard X-rays. Further refinement is necessary because error bars on the best-fit slopes of the fundamental plane are generally large, and also the inferred coefficients can be sensitive to the adopted sample of black holes. In this work, we regress the fundamental plane with a Bayesian technique.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
