On Pseudocodewords and Decision Regions of Linear Programming Decoding of HDPC Codes
Asi Lifshitz, Yair Be'ery

TL;DR
This paper investigates the decision regions of LP decoding for HDPC codes, compares it with BP and ML decoders, and analyzes the impact of pseudocodewords on decoding performance.
Contribution
It introduces global optimization for finding minimal pseudoweights and provides a complete pseudoweight distribution for the extended Golay code.
Findings
LP decision regions differ from BP and ML regions
Minimal pseudoweights significantly influence LP decoding performance
Pseudoweight distribution alone cannot tightly bound error probability
Abstract
In this paper we explore the decision regions of Linear Programming (LP) decoding. We compare the decision regions of an LP decoder, a Belief Propagation (BP) decoder and the optimal Maximum Likelihood (ML) decoder. We study the effect of minimal-weight pseudocodewords on LP decoding. We present global optimization as a method for finding the minimal pseudoweight of a given code as well as the number of minimal-weight generators. We present a complete pseudoweight distribution for the [24; 12; 8] extended Golay code, and provide justifications of why the pseudoweight distribution alone cannot be used for obtaining a tight upper bound on the error probability.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsError Correcting Code Techniques · Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques · Coding theory and cryptography
