Quantum Monte Carlo, time-dependent density functional theory, and density functional theory calculations of diamondoid excitation energies and Stokes shifts
F. Marsusi, J. Sabbaghzadeh, and N. D. Drummond

TL;DR
This study compares various computational methods to predict excitation energies and Stokes shifts in small diamondoids, revealing size-dependent structural distortions and shifts, with QMC overestimating energies but DFT providing better experimental agreement.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive computational analysis of diamondoid excitation energies and Stokes shifts using QMC, DFT, and TD-DFT, highlighting size-dependent effects and structural distortions.
Findings
QMC overestimates excitation energies by ~0.8 eV.
DFT with B3LYP aligns better with experimental optical gaps.
Stokes shift decreases by ~0.1 eV per additional diamond cage.
Abstract
We have computed the absorption and emission energies and hence Stokes shifts of small diamondoids as a function of size using different theoretical approaches, including density functional theory and quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations. The absorption spectra of these molecules were also investigated by time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) and compared with experiment. We have analyzed the structural distortion and formation of a self-trapped exciton in the excited state, and we have studied the effects of these on the Stokes shift as a function of size. Compared to recent experiments, QMC overestimates the excitation energies by about 0.8(1) eV on average. Benefiting from a cancellation of errors, the optical gaps obtained in DFT calculations with the B3LYP functional are in better agreement with experiment. It is also shown that TD-B3LYP calculations can reproduce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
