Spatio-temporal Constraints on the Zoo Hypothesis, and the Breakdown of Total Hegemony
Duncan H Forgan

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the Zoo Hypothesis for Fermi's Paradox, demonstrating through analysis and simulations that total galactic hegemony by extraterrestrial civilizations is highly unlikely due to spatial and temporal constraints.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous analysis showing that the assumption of total hegemony in the Zoo Hypothesis is invalid under realistic inter-arrival and spatial distributions of civilizations.
Findings
Total hegemony is prevented by finite light speed and uncorrelated arrival times and locations.
Simulations show total hegemony breaks down even with low civilization populations.
The Zoo Hypothesis is better characterized as a 'soft' solution to Fermi's Paradox.
Abstract
The Zoo Hypothesis posits that we have not detected extraterrestrial intelligences (ETIs) because they deliberately prevent us from detecting them. While a valid solution to Fermi's Paradox, it is not particularly amenable to rigorous scientific analysis, as it implicitly assumes a great deal about the sociological structure of a plurality of civilisations. Any attempt to assess its worth must begin with its most basic assumption - that ETIs share a uniformity of motive in shielding Earth from extraterrestrial contact. This motive is often presumed to be generated by the influence of the first civilisation to arrive in the Galaxy. I show that recent work on inter-arrival time analysis, while necessary, is insufficient to assess the validity of the Zoo Hypothesis (and its related variants). The finite speed of light prevents an early civilisation from exerting immediate cultural…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
