Gravitational Wave Tests of General Relativity with the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework
Neil Cornish, Laura Sampson, Nico Yunes, Frans Pretorius

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the potential of gravitational wave observations to test general relativity using the parameterized post-Einsteinian framework, demonstrating that future detections can significantly improve bounds on deviations from Einstein's theory.
Contribution
The study applies the ppE framework to simulated gravitational wave data, assessing its effectiveness in detecting deviations from general relativity and highlighting the importance of accurate waveform models.
Findings
Parameter biases can be severe if wrong theories are assumed.
Gravitational wave observations will surpass binary pulsar bounds on deviations from GR.
The ppE framework effectively detects potential deviations in simulated data.
Abstract
Gravitational wave astronomy has tremendous potential for studying extreme astrophysical phenomena and exploring fundamental physics. The waves produced by binary black hole mergers will provide a pristine environment in which to study strong field, dynamical gravity. Extracting detailed information about these systems requires accurate theoretical models of the gravitational wave signals. If gravity is not described by General Relativity, analyses that are based on waveforms derived from Einstein's field equations could result in parameter biases and a loss of detection efficiency. A new class of "parameterized post-Einsteinian" (ppE) waveforms has been proposed to cover this eventuality. Here we apply the ppE approach to simulated data from a network of advanced ground based interferometers (aLIGO/aVirgo) and from a future spaced based interferometer (LISA). Bayesian inference and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
