Reply to "Comment on arXiv:1012.1484v1 Structural origin of apparent Fermi surface pockets in angle-resolved photoemission of Bi_2Sr_{2-x}La_xCuO_{6+\delta} by King et al."
P.D.C. King, J.A. Rosen, W. Meevasana, A. Tamai, E. Rozbicki, R., Comin, G. Levy, D. Fournier, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, K.M. Shen, N.J.C. Ingle,, A. Damascelli, F. Baumberger
TL;DR
This paper is a reply addressing critiques of a previous study on the structural origins of Fermi surface features in a high-temperature superconductor, clarifying the original findings and countering the comment's points.
Contribution
It provides a detailed response defending the original interpretation of Fermi surface features against the critique by Zhou et al.
Findings
Reaffirms the structural origin of Fermi surface pockets
Clarifies the methodology used in the original study
Counters the arguments presented in the comment
Abstract
Reply to comment by Zhou et al. (arXiv:1012.3602) on arXiv:1012.1484 / Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 127005 (2011).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research