Comment on "N-body simulations of gravitational dynamics" by Dehnen and Read
Adrian L. Melott (University of Kansas)

TL;DR
This paper critiques a review of N-body simulations, emphasizing missing milestones, the importance of particle number and force smoothing, and the need to consider constraints for accurate gravitational modeling.
Contribution
It highlights overlooked historical milestones, stresses the significance of particle number and force smoothing, and discusses constraints affecting N-body simulation accuracy.
Findings
Historical milestones in N-body simulations are incomplete.
Particle number and force smoothing are crucial for realistic simulations.
Published constraints limit the scope of feasible N-body simulations.
Abstract
It is shown that the historical summary of the growth in size of N-body simulations as measured by particle number in this review is missing some key milestones. Size matters, because particle number with appropriate force smoothing is a key method to suppress unwanted discreteness, so that the initial conditions and equations of motion are appropriate to growth by gravitational instability in a Poisson-Vlasov system appropriate to a Universe with dark matter. Published strong constraints on what can be done are not included in the review.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Scientific Research and Discoveries · Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
