An accurate measurement of the anisotropies and mean level of the Cosmic Infrared Background at 100 and 160 um
Aur\'elie P\'enin, Guilaine Lagache, Alberto Noriega-Crepo, Julien, Grain, Marc-Antoine Miville-Desch\^enes, Nicolas Ponthieu, Peter Martin,, Kevin Blagrave, Felix J. Lockman

TL;DR
This paper presents a precise measurement of the cosmic infrared background's anisotropies and mean levels at 100 and 160 micrometers by effectively removing Galactic dust contamination using HI data, aligning with galaxy evolution models.
Contribution
It introduces a method to accurately subtract Galactic cirrus contamination from far-infrared maps using HI data, enabling improved measurements of the CIB anisotropies and mean levels.
Findings
Measured CIB mean at 160μm: 0.77±0.04±0.12 MJy/sr
Measured CIB mean at 100μm: 0.24±0.08±0.04 MJy/sr
Results agree with galaxy evolution models but differ from previous DIRBE measurements.
Abstract
The measurement of the anisotropies in the cosmic infrared background (CIB) is a powerful mean of studying the evolution of galaxies and large-scale structures. These anisotropies have been measured by a number of experiments, from the far-infrared to the millimeter. One of the main impediments to an accurate measurement on large scales is the contamination of the foreground signal by Galactic dust emission. Our goal is to show that we can remove the Galactic cirrus contamination using HI data, and thus accurately measure the clustering of starburst galaxies in the CIB. We use observations of the ELAIS N1 field at far-infrared (100 and 160{\mu}m) and radio (21 cm) wavelengths. We compute the correlation between dust emission, traced by far-infrared observations, and HI gas traced by 21cm observations, and derive dust emissivities that enable us to subtract the cirrus emission from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
