X-ray observations of highly obscured 9.7 micron sources: an efficient method for selecting Compton-thick AGN ?
I. Georgantopoulos (INAF/OABO, NOA), K.M. Dasyra (CEA Saclay, Obs., Paris), E. Rovilos (INAF/OABO), A. Pope (NOAO), Y. Wu (Spitzer Science, Center), M. Dickinson (NOAO), A. Comastri (INAF/OABO), R. Gilli (INAF/OABO),, D. Elbaz (CEA Saclay), L. Armus (Spitzer Science Center)

TL;DR
This study evaluates the effectiveness of using deep 9.7 micron Si absorption features as an indicator for selecting Compton-thick AGN, demonstrating a high success rate in local and high-redshift samples.
Contribution
It provides the first direct evidence linking mid-IR optically-thick galaxies with Compton-thick AGN and assesses the method's applicability at higher redshifts.
Findings
Approximately 70% of local high-tau sources are likely Compton-thick AGN.
The technique shows comparable or better success rates than other IR-based methods.
High X-ray luminosities support the AGN nature of high-tau sources at high redshift.
Abstract
Spitzer/IRS has revealed many sources with very deep Si features at 9.7micron (tau>1). We set out to investigate whether a strong Si absorption feature is a good indicator for the presence of a heavily obscured AGN. We compile X-ray spectroscopic observations available in the literature on the optically-thick,tau(9.7)>1 sources from the IRAS Seyfert sample. We find that the majority of the high-tau optically confirmed Seyferts (6/9) in this sample are probably CT. Thus we provide direct evidence for a connection between mid-IR optically-thick galaxies and CT AGN, with the success rate being close to 70% in the local Universe. This is at least comparable, if not better, than other rates obtained with photometric information in the mid to far-IR, or even mid-IR to Xray. However, this technique cannot provide complete CT AGN samples,ie there are many CT AGN which do not show significant Si…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
