TL;DR
This paper analyzes the asymptotic behavior of sampling-based motion planning algorithms, introduces provably asymptotically optimal variants, and connects their performance to random geometric graph theory.
Contribution
It introduces PRM* and RRT* algorithms that are proven to be asymptotically optimal, improving upon existing methods with theoretical guarantees.
Findings
Existing algorithms converge to non-optimal solutions.
PRM* and RRT* are asymptotically optimal with convergence to the true optimum.
Computational complexity of new algorithms is comparable to traditional ones.
Abstract
During the last decade, sampling-based path planning algorithms, such as Probabilistic RoadMaps (PRM) and Rapidly-exploring Random Trees (RRT), have been shown to work well in practice and possess theoretical guarantees such as probabilistic completeness. However, little effort has been devoted to the formal analysis of the quality of the solution returned by such algorithms, e.g., as a function of the number of samples. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap, by rigorously analyzing the asymptotic behavior of the cost of the solution returned by stochastic sampling-based algorithms as the number of samples increases. A number of negative results are provided, characterizing existing algorithms, e.g., showing that, under mild technical conditions, the cost of the solution returned by broadly used sampling-based algorithms converges almost surely to a non-optimal value. The main…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
