Comparative analysis of the accuracy of the distance to the observed object for geometric methods
Sergey Alexandrovich Pyunninen

TL;DR
This paper compares the accuracy of geometric methods in estimating the distance to an observed object using noisy bearing-only data, highlighting their relative performance in such conditions.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of geometric methods' accuracy in noisy bearing-only observations, which is a novel evaluation in this context.
Findings
Different geometric methods vary in accuracy under noise
Some methods outperform others in specific scenarios
The analysis guides method selection for noisy observations
Abstract
The article presents a comparative analysis of the accuracy of the distance to the observed object for geometric methods in noisy observations of bearings-only information.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
