Some 0/1 polytopes need exponential size extended formulations
Thomas Rothvo{\ss}

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that certain 0/1 polytopes, including TSP polytopes, require exponential size extended formulations, indicating fundamental complexity limitations for linear programming approaches.
Contribution
It proves exponential lower bounds on the extension complexity of specific 0/1 polytopes, including matroid and TSP polytopes, under standard complexity assumptions.
Findings
Existence of 0/1 polytopes with exponential extension complexity
Extension complexity of certain polytopes is at least 2^{n/2*(1-o(1))}
Results imply no compact LP formulation for TSP polytope under common complexity assumptions
Abstract
We prove that there are 0/1 polytopes P that do not admit a compact LP formulation. More precisely we show that for every n there is a sets X \subseteq {0,1}^n such that conv(X) must have extension complexity at least 2^{n/2 * (1-o(1))}. In other words, every polyhedron Q that can be linearly projected on conv(X) must have exponentially many facets. In fact, the same result also applies if conv(X) is restricted to be a matroid polytope. Conditioning on NP not contained in P_{/poly}, our result rules out the existence of any compact formulation for the TSP polytope, even if the formulation may contain arbitrary real numbers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Advanced Graph Theory Research · graph theory and CDMA systems
