Constraints on Cold Magnetized Shocks in Gamma-Ray Bursts
Ramesh Narayan (1), Pawan Kumar (2), Alexander Tchekhovskoy (3) ((1), Harvard-CfA, (2) University of Texas, (3) Princeton)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the efficiency of magnetized shocks in gamma-ray bursts and finds they are too inefficient to explain observations unless magnetic energy is converted to thermal energy, suggesting alternative models like thermal pressure-driven jets.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative analysis of magnetized shock efficiency in GRBs and compares it with observational data, highlighting the need for additional processes or alternative models.
Findings
Magnetized shocks are radiatively inefficient in GRBs.
Converting magnetic energy to thermal energy can increase radiative efficiency.
Thermal pressure-driven jets can produce sufficient prompt emission.
Abstract
We consider a model in which the ultra-relativistic jet in a gamma-ray burst (GRB) is cold and magnetically accelerated. We assume that the energy flux in the outflowing material is partially thermalized via internal shocks or a reverse shock, and we estimate the maximum amount of radiation that could be produced in such magnetized shocks. We compare this estimate with the available observational data on prompt gamma-ray emission in GRBs. We find that, even with highly optimistic assumptions, the magnetized jet model is radiatively too inefficient to be consistent with observations. One way out is to assume that much of the magnetic energy in the post-shock, or even pre-shock, jet material is converted to particle thermal energy by some unspecified process, and then radiated. This can increase the radiative efficiency sufficiently to fit observations. Alternatively, jet acceleration may…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
