Toward an optimal search strategy of optical and gravitational wave emissions from binary neutron star coalescence
D.M. Coward, B. Gendre, P.J. Sutton, E.J. Howell, T. Regimbau, M., Laas-Bourez, A. Klotz, M. Boer, M. Branchesi

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the potential of coordinated optical and gravitational wave observations from binary neutron star mergers, proposing an optimal search strategy based on model extrapolations and telescope sensitivities.
Contribution
It introduces a method to estimate detection rates of optical counterparts to gravitational wave events using observed gamma-ray bursts and models their afterglows for different telescopes.
Findings
Median detection rate of 4 per year for combined optical and GW observations.
GRB 050724-like bursts could be detected up to five days post-trigger.
Rapid response followed by deep imaging is optimal for identifying optical emissions.
Abstract
Observations of an optical source coincident with gravitational wave emission detected from a binary neutron star coalescence will improve the confidence of detection, provide host galaxy localisation, and test models for the progenitors of short gamma ray bursts. We employ optical observations of three short gamma ray bursts, 050724, 050709, 051221, to estimate the detection rate of a coordinated optical and gravitational wave search of neutron star mergers. Model R-band optical afterglow light curves of these bursts that include a jet-break are extrapolated for these sources at the sensitivity horizon of an Advanced LIGO/Virgo network. Using optical sensitivity limits of three telescopes, namely TAROT (m=18), Zadko (m=21) and an (8-10) meter class telescope (m=26), we approximate detection rates and cadence times for imaging. We find a median coincident detection rate of 4 yr^{-1} for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
