d-Wave superconductivity on the checkerboard Hubbard model at weak and strong coupling
Shiladitya Chakraborty, David S\'en\'echal, and A.-M.S. Tremblay

TL;DR
This study investigates how inhomogeneity affects d-wave superconductivity in the checkerboard Hubbard model across different coupling regimes, revealing suppression in weak coupling and monotonic decrease in strong coupling, with implications for high-Tc materials.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of inhomogeneity effects on d-wave superconductivity in the checkerboard Hubbard model at both weak and strong coupling regimes.
Findings
In weak coupling, inhomogeneity suppresses the order parameter at low to intermediate doping.
In strong coupling, inhomogeneity monotonically decreases the superconducting order parameter.
A first-order transition from superconducting to normal state occurs at high inhomogeneity in the underdoped regime.
Abstract
It has been argued that inhomogeneity generally can enhance superconductivity in the cuprate high-Tc materials. To check the validity of this claim, we study d-wave superconductivity on the checkerboard Hubbard model on a square lattice using the Cellular Dynamical Mean Field theory method with an exact diagonalization solver at zero temperature. The d-wave order parameter is computed for various inhomogeneity levels over the entire doping range of interest in both strong and weak coupling regimes. At a given doping, the size of the d-wave order parameter manifests itself directly in the height of the coherence peaks and hence is an appropriate measure of the strength of superconductivity. The weak coupling results reveal a suppression of the order parameter in the presence of inhomogeneity for small to intermediate hole dopings, while it is enhanced for large dopings. In contrast, for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
