Measurement of zero degree single photon energy spectra for sqrt(s) = 7TeV proton-proton collisions at LHC
O. Adriani, L. Bonechi, M. Bongi, G. Castellini, R. D'Alessandro, A., Faus, K. Fukatsu, M. Haguenauer, Y. Itow, K. Kasahara, K. Kawade, D. Macina,, T. Mase, K. Masuda, Y. Matsubara, H. Menjo, G. Mitsuka, Y. Muraki, M. Nakai,, K. Noda, P. Papini, A.-L. Perrot, S. Ricciarini

TL;DR
This paper reports the first measurements of very forward single photon energy spectra at 7 TeV proton-proton collisions at the LHC, comparing results with various hadron interaction models.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental data on forward photon spectra at 7 TeV and evaluates the accuracy of existing hadron interaction models against these measurements.
Findings
None of the models perfectly match the data.
DPMJET 3.04 and PYTHIA overpredict photon yields above 2 TeV.
QGSJET II-03 underpredicts photon yields, especially above 2 TeV.
Abstract
In early 2010, the Large Hadron Collider forward (LHCf) experiment measured very forward neutral particle spectra in LHC proton-proton collisions. From a limited data set taken under the best beam conditions (low beam-gas background and low occurance of pile-up events), the single photon spectra at sqrt(s)=7TeV and pseudo-rapidity (eta) ranges from 8.81 to 8.99 and from 10.94 to infinity were obtained for the first time and are reported in this paper. The spectra from two independent LHCf detectors are consistent with one another and serve as a cross check of the data. The photon spectra are also compared with the predictions of several hadron interaction models that are used extensively for modeling ultra high energy cosmic ray showers. Despite conservative estimates for the systematic errors, none of the models agree perfectly with the measurements. A notable difference is found…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
