On the formation location of Uranus and Neptune as constrained by dynamical and chemical models of comets
Jj Kavelaars, Olivier Mousis, Jean-Marc Petit, and Harold A. Weaver

TL;DR
This paper combines chemical and dynamical models to constrain the formation locations of Uranus and Neptune, suggesting they were closer to Saturn during the Oort cloud formation, consistent with the Nice model.
Contribution
It integrates chemical D/H enrichment data with dynamical simulations to infer the early positions of Uranus and Neptune relative to Saturn.
Findings
Uranus and Neptune likely formed closer to Saturn than today.
Comets' D/H ratios link their source regions to planetary formation zones.
Results support the Nice model of outer solar system evolution.
Abstract
The D/H enrichment observed in Saturn's satellite Enceladus is remarkably similar to the values observed in the nearly-isotropic comets. Given the predicted strong variation of D/H with heliocentric distance in the solar nebula, this observation links the primordial source region of the nearly-isotropic comets with the formation location of Enceladus. That is, comets from the nearly-isotropic class were most likely fed into their current reservoir, the Oort cloud, from a source region near the formation location of Enceladus. Dynamical simulations of the formation of the Oort cloud indicate that Uranus and Neptune are, primarily, responsible for the delivery of material into the Oort cloud. In addition, Enceladus formed from material that condensed from the solar nebula near the location at which Saturn captured its gas envelope, most likely at or near Saturn's current location in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
