The Pros and Cons of Compressive Sensing for Wideband Signal Acquisition: Noise Folding vs. Dynamic Range
Mark A. Davenport, Jason N. Laska, John R. Treichler, and Richard G., Baraniuk

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the trade-offs of using compressive sensing in wideband radio receivers, highlighting noise sensitivity and potential for increased dynamic range, with analysis and simulations comparing it to traditional methods.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of noise folding and dynamic range in CS-based wideband receivers, combining theoretical insights with simulation results.
Findings
CS reduces measurement count but increases noise sensitivity
CS can achieve larger dynamic range due to lower sampling rates
Trade-offs limit some applications but offer practical advantages
Abstract
Compressive sensing (CS) exploits the sparsity present in many signals to reduce the number of measurements needed for digital acquisition. With this reduction would come, in theory, commensurate reductions in the size, weight, power consumption, and/or monetary cost of both signal sensors and any associated communication links. This paper examines the use of CS in the design of a wideband radio receiver in a noisy environment. We formulate the problem statement for such a receiver and establish a reasonable set of requirements that a receiver should meet to be practically useful. We then evaluate the performance of a CS-based receiver in two ways: via a theoretical analysis of its expected performance, with a particular emphasis on noise and dynamic range, and via simulations that compare the CS receiver against the performance expected from a conventional implementation. On the one…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
