Noise Filtering Strategies of Adaptive Signaling Networks: The Case of E. Coli Chemotaxis
Pablo Sartori, Yuhai Tu

TL;DR
This paper investigates how adaptive signaling networks, specifically E. coli chemotaxis, filter different types of noise through mechanisms like time-averaging and negative feedback, revealing new insights into molecular processes and noise sources.
Contribution
The study clarifies the molecular basis of the Berg-Purcell time-averaging scheme and identifies a novel external noise source from cell movement, enhancing understanding of noise filtering in chemotaxis.
Findings
High frequency noise is filtered by CheY-P dephosphorylation.
Low frequency noise is damped by receptor adaptation.
Cell movement introduces a significant external noise component.
Abstract
Two distinct mechanisms for filtering noise in an input signal are identified in a class of adaptive sensory networks. We find that the high frequency noise is filtered by the output degradation process through time-averaging; while the low frequency noise is damped by adaptation through negative feedback. Both filtering processes themselves introduce intrinsic noises, which are found to be unfiltered and can thus amount to a significant internal noise floor even without signaling. These results are applied to E. coli chemotaxis. We show unambiguously that the molecular mechanism for the Berg-Purcell time-averaging scheme is the dephosphorylation of the response regulator CheY-P, not the receptor adaptation process as previously suggested. The high frequency noise due to the stochastic ligand binding-unbinding events and the random ligand molecule diffusion is averaged by the CheY-P…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
