Radioactivity Backgrounds in ZEPLIN-III
H. M. Araujo, D. Yu. Akimov, E. J. Barnes, V. A. Belov, A. Bewick, A., A. Burenkov, V. Chepel. A. Currie, L. DeViveiros, B. Edwards, C. Ghag, A., Hollingsworth, M. Horn, G. E. Kalmus, A. S. Kobyakin, A. G. Kovalenko, V. N., Lebedenko, A. Lindote, M. I. Lopes, R. Luscher

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the radioactivity backgrounds in the ZEPLIN-III dark matter detector, showing significant improvements in electron recoil rates, predicting neutron-induced recoils, and discussing additional background sources affecting future sensitivity.
Contribution
The study provides detailed background measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and discusses novel background sources impacting the detector's sensitivity to dark matter.
Findings
Electron recoil rate reduced 20-fold from first run
Predicted neutron recoil rate of 3.05±0.5 per year
Potential sensitivity of ~1×10⁻⁸ pb·year to WIMP-nucleon cross-section
Abstract
We examine electron and nuclear recoil backgrounds from radioactivity in the ZEPLIN-III dark matter experiment at Boulby. The rate of low-energy electron recoils in the liquid xenon WIMP target is 0.750.05 events/kg/day/keV, which represents a 20-fold improvement over the rate observed during the first science run. Energy and spatial distributions agree with those predicted by component-level Monte Carlo simulations propagating the effects of the radiological contamination measured for materials employed in the experiment. Neutron elastic scattering is predicted to yield 3.050.5 nuclear recoils with energy 5-50 keV per year, which translates to an expectation of 0.4 events in a 1-year dataset in anti-coincidence with the veto detector for realistic signal acceptance. Less obvious background sources are discussed, especially in the context of future experiments. These include…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
