
TL;DR
This paper investigates definable subsets of Baire space within an intuitionistic framework, exploring their properties, classifications, and the impact of Brouwer's axioms on their structure, leading to a collapse of the projective hierarchy.
Contribution
It introduces an intuitionistic approach to projective sets, avoiding complement operations and proving separation and boundedness theorems under Brouwer's axioms.
Findings
Brouwer's Thesis proves separation for strictly analytic sets.
The projective hierarchy collapses to levels.
Certain classes of sets are likely not .
Abstract
We study `definable' subsets of Baire space . The logic of our arguments is intuitionistic and we use L.E.J.~Brouwer's Thesis on bars in and his continuity axioms. We avoid the operation of taking the complement of a subset of . A subset of is or: analytic if it is the projection of a closed subset of . Important set are the set of the codes of all closed and located subsets of that are positively uncountable and the set of the codes of all located and closed subsets of containing at least one member coding a (positively) infinite subset of . A subset of is strictly analytic if it is the projection of a closed and located subset of . Brouwer's Thesis on bars in proves separation and boundedness…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
