A matter-dominated cosmological model with variable $G$ and $\Lambda$. Confrontation of theoretical predictions with observational data
Ester Piedipalumbo, Paolo Scudellaro, Giampiero Esposito, Claudio, Rubano

TL;DR
This paper investigates a matter-dominated cosmological model with variable G and Λ, comparing its predictions with observational data from supernovae, gamma-ray bursts, and galaxy clusters, and finds it consistent with current observations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of a variable G and Λ cosmological model, confronting it with multiple observational datasets and applying a cosmographic approach for validation.
Findings
The model aligns with supernovae, gamma-ray bursts, and galaxy cluster data.
Cosmographic parameters support the model's compatibility with observations.
Including radiation in the model shows a transition from radiation to matter dominance after inflation.
Abstract
In the framework of renormalization-group improved cosmologies, we analyze both theoretically and observationally the exact and general solution of the matter-dominated cosmological equations, using the expression of \Lambda = \Lambda(G) already determined by the integration method employed in a previous paper. A rough comparison between such a model and the concordance \LambdaCDM model as to the magnitude-redshift relationship has been already done, without showing any appreciable differences. We here perform a more refined study of how astrophysical data (Union2 set) on type-I supernovae, gamma ray bursts (in a sample calibrated in a model independent way with the SneIa dataset), and gas fraction in galaxy clusters (using a sample of Chandra measurements of the X-ray gas mass fraction) affect the model and constrain its parameters. We also apply a cosmographic approach to our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
