The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9
Chris Blake, Sarah Brough, Matthew Colless, Carlos Contreras, Warrick, Couch, Scott Croom, Tamara Davis, Michael J. Drinkwater, Karl Forster, David, Gilbank, Mike Gladders, Karl Glazebrook, Ben Jelliffe, Russell J. Jurek,, I-hui Li, Barry Madore, Chris Martin, Kevin Pimbblet

TL;DR
This paper measures the growth rate of cosmic structure across redshifts 0.1 to 0.9 using WiggleZ survey data, supporting the flat LCDM model and providing new insights into velocity divergence and galaxy bias.
Contribution
It provides the first measurements of the velocity divergence power spectrum and tests galaxy bias models, enhancing understanding of structure growth and dark energy.
Findings
Growth rate measurements are consistent with flat LCDM model.
First measurement of the velocity divergence power spectrum P_vv(k).
WiggleZ galaxy bias is scale-independent for k < 0.3 h/Mpc.
Abstract
We present precise measurements of the growth rate of cosmic structure for the redshift range 0.1 < z < 0.9, using redshift-space distortions in the galaxy power spectrum of the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. Our results, which have a precision of around 10% in four independent redshift bins, are well-fit by a flat LCDM cosmological model with matter density parameter Omega_m = 0.27. Our analysis hence indicates that this model provides a self-consistent description of the growth of cosmic structure through large-scale perturbations and the homogeneous cosmic expansion mapped by supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations. We achieve robust results by systematically comparing our data with several different models of the quasi-linear growth of structure including empirical models, fitting formulae calibrated to N-body simulations, and perturbation theory techniques. We extract the first…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
