Evolution in the Continuum Morphological Properties of Lyman-Alpha-Emitting Galaxies from z=3.1 to z=2.1
Nicholas Bond, Eric Gawiser, Lucia Guaita, Nelson Padilla, Caryl, Gronwall, Robin Ciardullo, and Kamson Lai

TL;DR
This study compares the morphological properties of Lyman Alpha Emitters at redshifts 3.1 and 2.1, revealing size evolution and correlations with physical properties, providing insights into galaxy evolution during this epoch.
Contribution
It presents a detailed UV morphological analysis of LAEs at two redshifts, highlighting size evolution and property correlations, which were not previously characterized in this detail.
Findings
Median half-light radius increases from 1.0 to 1.4 kpc between z=3.1 and z=2.1
LAE sizes correlate with stellar mass, star formation rate, and dust obscuration
No evolution observed in the number of multi-component systems
Abstract
We present a rest-frame ultraviolet morphological analysis of 108 z=2.1 Lyman Alpha Emitters (LAEs) in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South (ECDF-S) and compare it to a similar sample of 171 LAEs at z=3.1. Using Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images from the Galaxy Evolution from Morphology and SEDs survey, Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey, and Hubble Ultradeep Field, we measure size and photometric component distributions, where photometric components are defined as distinct clumps of UV-continuum emission. At both redshifts, the majority of LAEs have observed half-light radii <~ 2 kpc, but the median half-light radius rises from 1.0 kpc at z=3.1 to 1.4 kpc at z=2.1. A similar evolution is seen in the sizes of individual rest-UV components, but there is no evidence for evolution in the number of multi-component systems. In the z=2.1 sample, we see clear correlations between the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
