Tomography from the Next Generation of Cosmic Shear Experiments for Viable f(R) Models
Stefano Camera, Antonaldo Diaferio, Vincenzo F. Cardone

TL;DR
This paper investigates the cosmic shear signals predicted by two f(R) gravity models, demonstrating that the Hu & Sawicki model can be distinguished from LCDM with upcoming Euclid data, supporting f(R) theories as alternatives to dark energy.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed forecast of cosmic shear signals for Starobinsky and Hu & Sawicki f(R) models using Euclid-like data, highlighting their distinguishability from LCDM.
Findings
Hu & Sawicki model's shear signal is distinguishable from LCDM.
Starobinsky model's shear signal is nearly degenerate with LCDM.
Bayes factor analysis favors the HS model if Euclid detects n_HS > 0.02.
Abstract
We present the cosmic shear signal predicted by two viable cosmological models in the framework of modified-action f(R) theories. We use f(R) models where the current accelerated expansion of the Universe is a direct consequence of the modified gravitational Lagrangian rather than Dark Energy (DE), either in the form of vacuum energy/cosmological constant or of a dynamical scalar field (e.g. quintessence). We choose Starobinsky's (St) and Hu & Sawicki's (HS) f(R) models, which are carefully designed to pass the Solar System gravity tests. In order to further support - or rule out - f(R) theories as alternative candidates to the DE hypothesis, we exploit the power of weak gravitational lensing, specifically of cosmic shear. We calculate the tomographic shear matrix as it would be measured by the upcoming ESA Cosmic Vision Euclid satellite. We find that in the St model the cosmic shear…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
