The number density and mass density of star-forming and quiescent galaxies at 0.4 < z < 2.2
Gabriel B. Brammer, Katherine E. Whitaker, Pieter G. van Dokkum,, Danilo Marchesini, Marijn Franx, Mariska Kriek, Ivo Labbe, Kyoung-Soo Lee,, Adam Muzzin, Ryan F. Quadri, Gregory Rudnick, Rik Williams

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of star-forming and quiescent galaxies from redshift 0.4 to 2.2, revealing significant growth in massive quiescent galaxies mainly due to galaxy transformation processes.
Contribution
It provides a robust two-color criterion for galaxy classification across a broad redshift range and extends previous density evolution studies to z=2.2.
Findings
Mass density of massive quiescent galaxies increases tenfold since z=2.
Star-forming galaxy density remains flat or decreases over time.
Less massive quiescent galaxies are continuously formed from star-forming galaxies.
Abstract
We study the build-up of the bimodal galaxy population using the NEWFIRM Medium-Band Survey, which provides excellent redshifts and well-sampled spectral energy distributions of ~27,000 galaxies with K<22.8 at 0.4 < z < 2.2. We first show that star-forming galaxies and quiescent galaxies can be robustly separated with a two-color criterion over this entire redshift range. We then study the evolution of the number density and mass density of quiescent and star-forming galaxies, extending the results of the COMBO-17, DEEP2, and other surveys to z=2.2. The mass density of quiescent galaxies with M > 3 10^11 solar masses increases by a factor of ~10 from z=2 to the present day, whereas the mass density in star-forming galaxies is flat or decreases over the same time period. Modest mass growth by a factor of 2 of individual quiescent galaxies can explain roughly half of the strong density…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
