Competition and cooperation in one-dimensional stepping stone models
K. S. Korolev, David R. Nelson

TL;DR
This paper investigates how spatial structure, density, and migration influence the persistence of mutualism in one-dimensional models, revealing phase transitions and conditions under which mutualism is maintained or lost.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of mutualism dynamics in one-dimensional stepping stone models, highlighting the roles of density and migration in phase transitions.
Findings
Mutualism persists only at high density and migration rates.
Loss of mutualism occurs via a directed percolation transition.
The phase diagram is significantly affected by an exceptional DP2 transition.
Abstract
Cooperative mutualism is a major force driving evolution and sustaining ecosystems. Although the importance of spatial degrees of freedom and number fluctuations is well-known, their effects on mutualism are not fully understood. With range expansions of microbes in mind, we show that, even when mutualism confers a distinct selective advantage, it persists only in populations with high density and frequent migrations. When these parameters are reduced, mutualism is generically lost via a directed percolation process, with a phase diagram strongly influenced by an exceptional DP2 transition.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and statistical mechanics · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Theoretical and Computational Physics
