A Principal Component Analysis of quasar UV spectra at z~3
I. P\^aris, P. Petitjean, E. Rollinde, E. Aubourg, N. Busca, R., Charlassier, T. Delubac, J.-Ch. Hamilton, J.-M. Le Goff, N., Palanque-Delabrouille, S. Peirani, Ch. Pichon, J. Rich, M. Vargas-Maga\~na, and Ch. Y\`eche

TL;DR
This study uses PCA on 78 high-quality z~3 quasar spectra from SDSS-DR7 to analyze the continuum and emission line properties, and to model the evolution of the Lyman-alpha forest absorption with redshift.
Contribution
It introduces a PCA-based method to predict quasar continua and analyze the evolution of the Lyman-alpha forest at z~3, providing eigenvectors and weights for simulation.
Findings
Continuum shape similar to low-z quasars but with larger emission line equivalent widths.
Correlation between emission line fluxes in different spectral regions.
Steeper decrease in mean flux of the Lyman-alpha forest at z~3.
Abstract
From a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of 78 z~3 high quality quasar spectra in the SDSS-DR7, we derive the principal components characterizing the QSO continuum over the full wavelength range available. The shape of the mean continuum, is similar to that measured at low-z (z~1), but the equivalent width of the emission lines are larger at low redshift. We calculate the correlation between fluxes at different wavelengths and find that the emission line fluxes in the red part of the spectrum are correlated with that in the blue part. We construct a projection matrix to predict the continuum in the Lyman- forest from the red part of the spectrum. We apply this matrix to quasars in the SDSS-DR7 to derive the evolution with redshift of the mean flux in the Lyman- forest due to the absorption by the intergalactic neutral hydrogen. A change in the evolution of the mean flux…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
