The Cepheid mass discrepancy and pulsation-driven mass loss
Hilding R. Neilson, Matteo Cantiello, Norbert Langer (AIfA)

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether pulsation-driven mass loss, combined with moderate convective core overshooting, can resolve the longstanding 10-20% mass discrepancy observed in classical Cepheids by allowing them to lose 5-10% of their mass during evolution.
Contribution
It introduces stellar evolution models with a pulsation-driven mass-loss prescription and demonstrates that this, along with core overshooting, can explain the Cepheid mass discrepancy.
Findings
Pulsation-driven mass loss causes Cepheids to lose 5-10% of their mass.
Moderate convective core overshooting is consistent with observational data.
The combined effect of mass loss and overshooting can resolve the mass discrepancy.
Abstract
Context. A longstanding challenge for understanding classical Cepheids is the Cepheid mass discrepancy, where theoretical mass estimates using stellar evolution and stellar pulsation calculations have been found to differ by approximately 10 - 20%. Aims. We study the role of pulsation-driven mass loss during the Cepheid stage of evolution as a possible solution to this mass discrepancy. Methods. We computed stellar evolution models with a Cepheid mass-loss prescription and various amounts of convective core overshooting. The contribution of mass loss towards the mass discrepancy is determined using these models, Results. Pulsation-driven mass loss is found to trap Cepheid evolution on the instability strip, allowing them to lose about 5 - 10% of their total mass when moderate convective core overshooting, an amount consistent with observations of other stars, is included in the stellar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
