Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and the Mass-to-Number Ratio of Galaxy Clusters

TL;DR

This paper combines galaxy clustering and cluster mass-to-number ratios from SDSS to constrain cosmological parameters Omega_m and sigma_8, providing results comparable to cluster abundance methods without relying on abundance data.

Contribution

It introduces a novel approach using galaxy clustering and cluster M/N ratios with Halo Occupation Distribution models to break degeneracies in cosmological constraints.

Findings

Constraints on Omega_m and sigma_8 consistent with current results.

Method is insensitive to uncertainties in halo mass function and mass-richness relation.

Combines clustering and M/N ratios to effectively constrain cosmology.

Abstract

We place constraints on the average density (Omega_m) and clustering amplitude (sigma_8) of matter using a combination of two measurements from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: the galaxy two-point correlation function, w_p, and the mass-to-galaxy-number ratio within galaxy clusters, M/N, analogous to cluster M/L ratios. Our w_p measurements are obtained from DR7 while the sample of clusters is the maxBCG sample, with cluster masses derived from weak gravitational lensing. We construct non-linear galaxy bias models using the Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) to fit both w_p and M/N for different cosmological parameters. HOD models that match the same two-point clustering predict different numbers of galaxies in massive halos when Omega_m or sigma_8 is varied, thereby breaking the degeneracy between cosmology and bias. We demonstrate that this technique yields constraints that are consistent and competitive with current results from cluster abundance studies, even though this technique does not use abundance information. Using w_p and M/N alone, we find Omega_m^0.5*sigma_8=0.465+/-0.026, with individual constraints of Omega_m=0.29+/-0.03 and sigma_8=0.85+/-0.06. Combined with current CMB data, these constraints are Omega_m=0.290+/-0.016 and sigma_8=0.826+/-0.020. All errors are 1-sigma. The systematic uncertainties that the M/N technique are most sensitive to are the amplitude of the bias function of dark matter halos and the possibility of redshift evolution between the SDSS Main sample and the maxBCG sample. Our derived constraints are insensitive to the current level of uncertainties in the halo mass function and in the mass-richness relation of clusters and its scatter, making the M/N technique complementary to cluster abundances as a method for constraining cosmology with future galaxy surveys.