Hermitian $(a, b)$-modules and Saito's "higher residue pairings"
Piotr P. Karwasz (IECN)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence and structure of Hermitian forms on regular (a, b)-modules, extending previous work to include higher residue pairings and providing explicit examples and applications.
Contribution
It proves that regular (a, b)-modules with non-degenerate bilinear forms decompose uniquely into modules with Hermitian or anti-Hermitian forms, and extends these results to modules associated with isolated singularities.
Findings
Every regular (a, b)-module with a non-degenerate bilinear form decomposes uniquely.
Explicit examples of modules with Hermitian and anti-Hermitian forms are provided.
The results connect to Saito's higher residue pairings, confirming their axioms.
Abstract
Following the work of Daniel Barlet ([Bar97]) and Ridha Belgrade ([Bel01]) the aim of this article is the study of the existence of -hermitian forms on regular -modules. We show that every regular -module with a non-degenerate bilinear form can be written in an unique way as a direct sum of -modules that admit either an -hermitian or an -anti-hermitian form or both; all three cases are equally possible with explicit examples. As an application we extend the result in [Bel01] on the existence for all -modules associated with the Brieskorn module of a holomorphic function with an isolated singularity, of an -bilinear non degenerate form on . We show that with a small transformation Belgrade's form can be considered -hermitian and that the result satis es the axioms of Kyoji Saito's "higher residue pairings".
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
