Exo--Zodiacal Dust Levels for Nearby Main Sequence Stars
R. Millan-Gabet, E. Serabyn, B. Mennesson, W. A. Traub, R. K. Barry,, W. C. Danchi, M. Kuchner, S. Ragland, M. Hrynevych, J. Woillez, K., Stapelfeldt, G. Bryden, M. M. Colavita, A. J. Booth

TL;DR
This study used the Keck Interferometer Nuller to measure exozodiacal dust levels around 25 nearby main sequence stars, providing the most stringent limits to date and insights into the prevalence of warm circumstellar dust.
Contribution
First direct mid-infrared survey of exozodiacal dust around nearby stars using nulling interferometry, establishing new upper limits and detection statistics.
Findings
Detected exozodiacal dust in 3 stars with quantified zodi levels.
Most stars show no significant exozodiacal dust, with an average upper limit of 150 zodis.
Results improve constraints on dust prevalence relevant for future exoplanet imaging.
Abstract
The Keck Interferometer Nuller (KIN) was used to survey 25 nearby main sequence stars in the mid-infrared, in order to assess the prevalence of warm circumstellar (exozodiacal) dust around nearby solar-type stars. The KIN measures circumstellar emission by spatially blocking the star but transmitting the circumstellar flux in a region typically 0.1 - 4 AU from the star. We find one significant detection (eta Crv), two marginal detections (gamma Oph and alpha Aql), and 22 clear non-detections. Using a model of our own Solar System's zodiacal cloud, scaled to the luminosity of each target star, we estimate the equivalent number of target zodis needed to match our observations. Our three zodi detections are eta Crv (1250 +/- 260), gamma Oph (200 +/- 80) and alpha Aql (600 +/- 200), where the uncertainties are 1-sigma. The 22 non-detected targets have an ensemble weighted average consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
