Complexity Results for Modal Dependence Logic
Peter Lohmann, Heribert Vollmer

TL;DR
This paper classifies the computational complexity of satisfiability problems in various fragments of modal dependence logic, revealing how restrictions on connectives affect complexity classes.
Contribution
It provides a complete complexity classification for satisfiability in different fragments of modal dependence logic, extending previous results by Väänänen and Sevenster.
Findings
Poor man's dependence logic remains NEXPTIME-complete.
Monotone formulas have PSPACE-complete satisfiability.
Adding classical disjunction retains NEXPTIME-completeness.
Abstract
Modal dependence logic was introduced recently by V\"a\"an\"anen. It enhances the basic modal language by an operator =(). For propositional variables p_1,...,p_n, =(p_1,...,p_(n-1);p_n) intuitively states that the value of p_n is determined by those of p_1,...,p_(n-1). Sevenster (J. Logic and Computation, 2009) showed that satisfiability for modal dependence logic is complete for nondeterministic exponential time. In this paper we consider fragments of modal dependence logic obtained by restricting the set of allowed propositional connectives. We show that satisfibility for poor man's dependence logic, the language consisting of formulas built from literals and dependence atoms using conjunction, necessity and possibility (i.e., disallowing disjunction), remains NEXPTIME-complete. If we only allow monotone formulas (without negation, but with disjunction), the complexity drops to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
