Ludics with repetitions (Exponentials, Interactive types and Completeness)
Claudia Faggian (CNRS - Paris7), Michele Basaldella (RIMS - Kyoto, Univ.)

TL;DR
This paper extends ludics to include repetitions, preserving interactive types and internal completeness, enabling full completeness for a polarized version of MELL and broadening its applicability.
Contribution
It introduces a novel extension of ludics that incorporates repetitions while maintaining core properties, facilitating transfer to new logical frameworks.
Findings
Achieved full completeness with a polarized MELL variant.
Extended ludics to allow repetitions without losing internal completeness.
Reduced reliance on original properties, enabling broader applications.
Abstract
Ludics is peculiar in the panorama of game semantics: we first have the definition of interaction-composition and then we have semantical types, as a set of strategies which "behave well" and react in the same way to a set of tests. The semantical types which are interpretations of logical formulas enjoy a fundamental property, called internal completeness, which characterizes ludics and sets it apart also from realizability. Internal completeness entails standard full completeness as a consequence. A growing body of work start to explore the potential of this specific interactive approach. However, ludics has some limitations, which are consequence of the fact that in the original formulation, strategies are abstractions of MALL proofs. On one side, no repetitions are allowed. On the other side, the proofs tend to rely on the very specific properties of the MALL proof-like strategies,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
