Reaffirming the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ superconducting gap using the auto-correlation angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of Bi$_{1.5}$Pb$_{0.55}$Sr$_{1.6}$La$_{0.4}$CuO$_{6+\delta}$
M. Hashimoto, R.-H. He, J. P. Testaud, W. Meevasana, R. G. Moore, D., H. Lu, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, T. P. Devereaux, Z. Hussain, Z.-X. Shen

TL;DR
This study uses autocorrelation ARPES with an octet model analysis to reaffirm that the superconducting gap in cuprates follows the canonical $d_{x^2-y^2}$ form, resolving previous contradictions from FT-STS and ARPES studies.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that considering matrix elements and the pseudogap in the octet model clarifies the superconducting gap structure in cuprates, reaffirming the canonical $d_{x^2-y^2}$ symmetry.
Findings
Reaffirms the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ superconducting gap symmetry.
Identifies limitations of the octet model without considering matrix elements.
Suggests FT-STS fluctuations are not necessary to explain quasiparticle interference.
Abstract
Knowledge of the gap function is important to understand the pairing mechanism for high-temperature () superconductivity. However, Fourier transform scanning tunneling spectroscopy (FT STS) and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) in the cuprates have reported contradictory gap functions, with FT-STS results deviating strongly from a canonical form. By applying an "octet model" analysis to autocorrelation ARPES, we reveal that a contradiction occurs because the octet model does not consider the effects of matrix elements and the pseudogap. This reaffirms the canonical superconducting gap around the node, which can be directly determined from ARPES. Further, our study suggests that the FT-STS reported fluctuating superconductivity around the node at far above is not necessary to explain the existence of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
