Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices I (ASTROD I) - A class-M fundamental physics mission proposal for Cosmic Vision 2015-2025: 2010 Update
Claus Braxmaier, Hansj\"org Dittus, Bernard Foulon, Ertan G\"okl\"u,, Catia Grimani, Jian Guo, Sven Herrmann, Claus L\"ammerzahl, Wei-Tou Ni, Achim, Peters, Benny Rievers, \'Etienne Samain, Hanns Selig, Diana Shaul, Drazen, Svehla, Pierre Touboul, Gang Wang, An-Ming Wu

TL;DR
ASTROD I is a planned interplanetary mission aiming to test General Relativity with unprecedented sensitivity, improve solar system measurements, and probe dark matter and dark energy, by using laser ranging and advanced instrumentation.
Contribution
This paper updates the ASTROD I mission design with a new orbit including a Venus swing-by, and discusses technical aspects like optical design and thermal issues, enhancing mission feasibility.
Findings
Orbit optimized with a Venus swing-by for quicker Sun opposition
Preliminary optical bench design presented
Mission aims to significantly improve gravity tests and solar system measurements
Abstract
This paper on ASTROD I is based on our 2010 proposal submitted for the ESA call for class-M mission proposals, and is a sequel and an update to our previous paper [Experimental Astronomy 23 (2009) 491-527; designated as Paper I] which was based on our last proposal submitted for the 2007 ESA call. In this paper, we present our orbit selection with one Venus swing-by together with orbit simulation. In Paper I, our orbit choice is with two Venus swing-bys. The present choice takes shorter time (about 250 days) to reach the opposite side of the Sun. We also present a preliminary design of the optical bench, and elaborate on the solar physics goals with the radiation monitor payload. We discuss telescope size, trade-offs of drag-free sensitivities, thermal issues and present an outlook. ASTROD I is a planned interplanetary space mission with multiple goals. The primary aims are: to test…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
