On the reliability of proxies for globular cluster collision rates
Thomas J. Maccarone (Southampton), Mark B. Peacock (Michigan State)

TL;DR
This study evaluates proxies for collision rates in globular clusters, finding that certain proxies closely approximate the full collision rate and that X-ray binary formation likely scales linearly with collision rates, with implications for neutron star retention.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of collision rate proxies with full models and explores their relationship with X-ray binary formation and neutron star retention in globular clusters.
Findings
Gamma accurately represents collision rates within 25% for most clusters.
Gamma_h correlates marginally better than luminosity with collision rates.
Evidence suggests X-ray binary formation is linearly proportional to collision rates.
Abstract
(Abridged) Proxies for the stellar collision rates in globular clusters are often used. We present comparisons between these proxies and the full integrated collision rate for King models. Gamma, defined to be rho_0^3/2 r_c^2\rho_0r_h$ is the half-light radius, is only marginally better correlated with the full King model collision rate than is the cluster luminosity. The two galaxies where results of King model fitting have been reported in detail show a dearth of core-collapsed clusters relative to that seen in the Milky Way, indicating that the core radii of the most…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
