A Utility Based Approach to Energy Hedging
John Cotter, Jim Hanly

TL;DR
This paper explores how different utility functions influence energy hedge strategies by incorporating market-based risk aversion, revealing significant variations in optimal hedging approaches.
Contribution
It introduces a method to incorporate energy market risk aversion into various utility functions for more tailored hedging strategies.
Findings
Significant differences in hedge strategies based on utility function choice
Market-based risk aversion impacts optimal hedge calculations
Comparison of log, exponential, and quadratic utility functions
Abstract
A key issue in the estimation of energy hedges is the hedgers' attitude towards risk which is encapsulated in the form of the hedgers' utility function. However, the literature typically uses only one form of utility function such as the quadratic when estimating hedges. This paper addresses this issue by estimating and applying energy market based risk aversion to commonly applied utility functions including log, exponential and quadratic, and we incorporate these in our hedging frameworks. We find significant differences in the optimal hedge strategies based on the utility function chosen.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMarket Dynamics and Volatility · Agricultural risk and resilience · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
