Calibration biases in measurements of weak lensing
Matthias Bartelmann (1), Massimo Viola (1), Peter Melchior (1, 3, 4),, Bj\"orn M. Sch\"afer (2) ((1) Zentrum f\"ur Astronomie, ITA, U. Heidelberg,, Germany, (2) Zentrum f\"ur Astronomie, ARI, U. Heidelberg, Germany, (3), Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics, OSU

TL;DR
This paper examines how non-linear calibration biases in weak lensing shear measurements can significantly bias cosmological parameters, emphasizing the need for bias-free methods or proper calibration verification.
Contribution
It demonstrates the impact of non-linear calibration relations on cosmological parameter estimates and highlights the importance of bias verification in weak lensing analyses.
Findings
Non-linear calibration introduces biases in shear measurements.
Bias magnitude depends on PSF width and measurement method.
Proper calibration verification is essential for reliable cosmological results.
Abstract
As recently shown by Viola et al., the common (KSB) method for measuring weak gravitational shear creates a non-linear relation between the measured and the true shear of objects. We investigate here what effect such a non-linear calibration relation may have on cosmological parameter estimates from weak lensing if a simpler, linear calibration relation is assumed. We show that the non-linear relation introduces a bias in the shear-correlation amplitude and thus a bias in the cosmological parameters Omega_matter and sigma_8. Its direction and magnitude depends on whether the point-spread function is narrow or wide compared to the galaxy images from which the shear is measured. Substantial over- or underestimates of the cosmological parameters are equally possible, depending also on the variant of the KSB method. Our results show that for trustable cosmological-parameter estimates from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
